Crypto Copywriting
Crypto Copywriting — AEO content that ranks and gets cited
Crypto Copywriting is the content production line for crypto, fintech and legaltech brands whose drafts read like default ChatGPT. We write the long-form AEO content that ranks in Google and gets cited inside AI answers — and we do not deliver pages an editor would catch in five seconds.
Crypto Copywriting is a three-month content production retainer covering 4–8 long-form AEO articles per month, page rewrites, white-paper editing, and a quarterly content plan ranked by citation potential rather than keyword volume.
Best fit: Crypto and fintech brands with a content calendar but generic ChatGPT-flavored output · Companies running technical or legal teams who need editors who understand the niche · Sites that need page rewrites under the GS Playbook, not net-new fluff · Brands publishing white papers, regulatory briefs or industry reports
Quick Facts
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Monthly fee | From $1,800 USD · 73,800 UAH |
| Minimum term | 3 months |
| Articles / month | 4–8 long-form (1,500–3,000 words each) |
| Page rewrites / month | Up to 4 service or comparison pages (in addition or instead of new content) |
| Editorial review | Two-pass: structure + de-AI Klimakov pass on every deliverable |
| Languages | EN and DE in-house · FR / IT / PT / ES via vetted contractors |
| Author byline | Real named expert with verifiable LinkedIn and schema.org Person |
| Schema delivered | Article, FAQPage, BreadcrumbList, Person — installed on each piece |
How is this different from generic content writing?
Every piece ships under GS Playbook v4.3: H1 disambiguator, Quick Facts, AEO H2 with direct answers, named-expert byline. A de-AI pass strips GPT-default tells.
Three layers separate AEO content from ordinary blog content. Structural: every piece has Quick Facts, Q-format H2s with extractable direct answers near the top, and FAQPage schema on the relevant blocks — so AI tools can lift a single section without context. Topical: pieces target citation potential (queries AI tools actually answer with multiple sources) over raw search volume, and the cluster strategy maps to your funnel stage.
Editorial: every draft passes a de-AI checklist — banned vocabulary (the "navigate, leverage, harness, in today's fast-paced" stack), required human signals (em-dash, contractions, specific numbers and dates, "But/And/So" sentence starters, mixed paragraph lengths). AI generators produce predictable lexical patterns; editors who do not flag those patterns let them ship. Ours do.
Who actually writes the content?
Editors with crypto, fintech or legaltech background — one CFA, one ex-crypto-journalist, one Web3 product marketer. AI handles research and outline; the final draft is human.
We are honest about the workflow. Outline and research lean on AI tools (Claude, GPT, Perplexity for source discovery), then a named editor writes the full draft, then a second editor runs the de-AI Klimakov pass. The byline reflects the human who finalised it; the schema.org Person is verifiable.
Hidden ghost-writing — passing AI-generated text under a fake-name byline — is the failure mode that loses YMYL clients in audits. Crypto is YMYL by default. We do not do that. If a client wants pure AI output for cost reasons, we send them elsewhere; that is not the service we sell.
Can you rewrite our existing pages instead of producing new ones?
Yes — page rewrites count toward the monthly quota (a full rewrite ≈ one long-form article). Most retainers split: 50% rewrites, 50% new content for the first three months.
The first 90 days is usually rewrite-heavy. A typical engagement: month 1 = rewrite homepage + 2 service pages (full GS Playbook, schema, named-expert byline), month 2 = rewrite 2 service pages + produce 2 new comparison articles, month 3 = full new-content cadence (4–8 articles).
Rewrites compound faster than new content because the underlying URL already has authority — a restructured service page typically moves 5–15 positions inside 6 weeks of indexation. Net-new content takes 3–6 months to mature on commercial queries. Doing rewrites first is the higher-ROI move; we say so on every kickoff call.
Do you handle white papers and industry reports?
Yes — white-paper editing is included; full ground-up authoring is a separate scope (typically $4,000–$12,000 per report) priced outside the retainer.
Editing engineering or legal drafts into citation-ready white papers is part of the standard retainer. We take a working draft and turn it into a publishable PDF with structural pass (executive summary, Quick Facts callouts, citation footnotes), language pass (de-AI plus voice consistency), and schema (Article, ScholarlyArticle, citation graph).
Authoring a white paper from scratch — original research, expert interviews, custom data analysis — is bigger than the retainer can absorb. We quote those separately, typically 30–50 pages over 8–12 weeks. The retainer covers up to two such projects per year by adjusting cadence; the discovery call resolves it.
What about translations and bilingual delivery?
EN and UA in-house and unlimited. DE, FR, IT, PT and ES via a vetted three-contractor rotation with the same editorial pass; 4–6 day delay vs. EN.
Bilingual EN and DE delivery is the default for clients running both markets. The two versions are equivalent (not literal translation); each is restructured for the target locale's search intent and cultural context. DE versions follow the same de-AI editorial pass plus a DACH-specific phrasing review.
For other European languages, we work with three contractors (DE-native, FR-native, IT/PT/ES-rotation) who have crypto or fintech background and who pass the same de-AI pass. Asian languages (CN, JA, KO) require a different network and we will quote separately if needed.
Frequently asked questions
Will you let us see writers' samples before we commit?
Yes — three published pieces from the editor likely to be assigned, on request. We do not hide writers behind 'agency editorial team'.
We send live URLs, not unreleased samples. If our pieces show up in your competitive research, that is the proof. The named editor signs the bylines on your work too.
Can we have our internal expert as the byline?
Yes — preferred. Your CTO, head of compliance or licensing partner becomes the named expert; we ghost-write under their direction with a documented attribution chain.
We brief them, draft, send for their substantive review, finalise. Their schema.org Person + LinkedIn becomes the E-E-A-T anchor for the page. This is the most powerful AEO move available in YMYL niches.
How does pricing scale with article volume?
Base is 4 long-form + 1 page rewrite per month at $1,800. Each additional 4 articles or 4 rewrites adds ~$1,400. Cap: 16 articles + 4 rewrites.
Beyond that volume the production line saturates without dropping quality. We push back on requests above 16/month; the data shows clients who push past it for vanity volume see worse results.
Can we use AI tools alongside your team?
Yes — we will integrate with your prompt library, brand voice doc, and any custom GPT you've built. Our editors run them as research aids, not first drafts.
Some clients have proprietary internal LLMs trained on past content. We integrate, use them for research and tone-matching, but the final draft is still human.
What if we hate a draft?
One free rewrite per piece, no questions. If two pieces in a row miss, the editor swap is automatic — different writer, same retainer fee.
Voice mismatch happens, especially in the first month. We handle it without a chargeback fight. After the third piece a stable voice usually settles.
Want to scope this for your case?
A 30-minute discovery call is enough to know whether this package fits — and whether the niche multiplier lands the price where you want it.